1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 253 S.C.
  5. 253 S.C. 562 (1970)
 

BURROUGHS v. HOLLER

19011

253 S.C. 562 (1970)

172 S.E.2d 303

Franklin G. BURROUGHS, Complainant, v. Arthur W. HOLLER, III Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

February 2, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General, and Irvin D. Parker, Assistant Attorney General, of Columbia, for Complainant.

H.T. Abbott, Esq., of Conway, for Respondent.

February 2, 1970.

Per Curiam:

This disciplinary proceeding is before us on a rule requiring the respondent, Arthur W. Holler, III, who was admitted to practice law by this court in 1962 and has since been engaged in such practice at Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, to show cause why a report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, finding him guilty of misconduct as an attorney and recommending his indefinite suspension from the practice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases