NISSAN v. BARTON

Docket No. 11696.

4 Cal.App.3d 76 (1970)

84 Cal. Rptr. 36

MARY J. NISSAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. WILLIAM BARTON, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 3, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mary J. Nissan, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

DeCristoforo & DeCristoforo, Kroloff, Belcher, Smart & Ford and William B. Boone for Defendant and Appellant.


OPINION

JANES, J.

Plaintiff Mary J. Nissan appeals from an order setting aside a default and default judgment which had been entered in her behalf against respondent William Barton. The default and default judgment were vacated upon the ground that both were void. Barton cross-appeals from the judgment. We will refer to plaintiff-appellant, who is also respondent on the cross-appeal, as "appellant" and to Barton as "respondent."<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases