1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 420 F.2d
  5. 420 F.2d 377 (1970)
 

UNITED STATES v. HOLLOM

No. 23727.

420 F.2d 377 (1970)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Charles Oscar HOLLOM, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 16, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick E. Watson (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Raymond Zvetina (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before MERRILL, KOELSCH and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Counsel for appellant has done an extraordinary job with the materials at hand. The theories of defense advanced on appeal were not, however, those adopted at trial and were not supported or preserved by trial objections. In no instance can we say that the error assigned was plain error that affected "substantial rights." Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b).

Nor can we agree with appellant that he did not receive effective...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases