DABOLING v. BECK


474 P.2d 322 (1970)

Harry DABOLING, Respondent, v. John M. BECK and Archie Weinstein, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided September 11, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo Levenson, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Husband, Johnson & Frye, Eugene.

Robert G. Ringo, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Bick, Monte, Joseph & McCool, Eugene, and Ringo, Walton & McClain, Corvallis.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, DENECKE and HOLMAN, JJ.


HOLMAN, Justice.

Plaintiff brought an action against the defendants for both assault and battery and false imprisonment. He asked for general and punitive damages in each cause of action. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for general damages upon each cause of action, but awarded no punitive damages. The defendants appealed from the judgment entered on the verdict.

After verdict, the facts must now be considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases