1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 204 Kan.
  5. 204 Kan. 591 (1970)
 

SIPES v. CRUM

No. 45,535

204 Kan. 591 (1970)

464 P.2d 1

JEAN KECK SIPES and JUNE KECK RICE, d/b/a KECK TWINS BEAUTY SHOP, Appellants, v. LUCILLE S. CRUM, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Edwin E. Crum, Deceased, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed January 24, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kay McFarland, of Topeka, argued the cause, and George A. Scott, Jack A. Quinlan, T.M. Murrell, and John A. Bell, all of Topeka, were with her on the brief for the appellants.

Charles S. Arthur, of Manhattan, argued the cause, and Charles D. Green, of Manhattan, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

HARMAN, C.:

This is an action for reformation of a contract of sale of a beauty salon. Appeal is from the trial court's order sustaining defendant's motion for directed verdict made at the conclusion of plaintiffs' evidence.

Plaintiffs Jean Keck Sipes and June Keck Rice commenced the action by filing their petition March 12, 1965, naming as defendants Edwin E. Crum, his wife, Lucille S. Crum, and Heckel Bros...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases