Per Curiam.
The conviction, insofar as based upon violation of subdivision 5 of section 240.20 of the Penal Law was, as conceded by the District Attorney, error (see People v. Kranish, N. Y. L. J., March 18, 1970, p. 2, col. 4 [App. Term, 1st Dept.]), for there was no proof defendants did anything more than demonstrate in the area prescribed therefor by the police.
We find no error, however, in the ruling below that, with intent to cause public...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
