1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 46 Wis.2d
  5. 46 Wis.2d 712 (1970)
 

GOFF v. MASSACHUSETTS PROTECTIVE ASSO., INC.

No. 207.

46 Wis.2d 712 (1970)

176 N.W.2d 576

GOFF, Appellant, v. MASSACHUSETTS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided April 28, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Jerome E. Randall of Milwaukee.

For the respondents there was a brief by Quarles, Herriott, Clemons, Teschner & Noelke and Charles Q. Kamps and Peter C. Linzmeyer, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Kamps.

HALLOWS, C. J.

Although Goff claims there are material facts in dispute, we do not agree. The first cause of action, for unjust enrichment, alleges the termination of the agency agreements by the defendants was without sufficient cause, was wrongful, unconscionable and contrary to public policy, and the defendants by retaining the deferred and renewal commissions earned by the plaintiff were unjustly being enriched.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases