STATE v. HANCOCK

No. State 89.

48 Wis.2d 687 (1970)

180 N.W.2d 517

STATE, Respondent, v. HANCOCK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 6, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by William W. Ward and Joseph W. Hughes, both of New Richmond, and oral argument by Mr. Hughes.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Allan O. Maki, district attorney of St. Croix county.


WILKIE, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Did the trial court commit prejudicial error in admitting into evidence the two loaded pistols carried by defendant's coconspirator at the time of the burglary?

2. Did the trial court err in restricting defense counsel's examination of the clerk of court?

3. Did the court improperly restrict defense counsel's final argument to the jury?

1. The admission into evidence of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases