PATE v. MUNICIPAL COURT

Docket No. 1172.

11 Cal.App.3d 721 (1970)

89 Cal. Rptr. 893

JESSIE C. PATE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE MODESTO JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY, Defendant and Respondent; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

September 29, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Carlos J. Badger for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Nelson P. Kempsky, Daniel J. Kremer and Russell L. Moore, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.


OPINION

GARGANO, J.

By complaint filed in the Municipal Court for the Modesto Judicial District, appellants were charged with knowingly having in their possession and exhibiting lewd and obscene motion pictures in violation of section 311.2 of the Penal Code, a misdemeanor. Appellants moved the court to suppress the evidence and exclude the press and public from the trial. The motions were denied. Appellants then petitioned the Superior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases