ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.
A new trial in the interest of justice is here required because of the jury finding that driver Martin was not in any respect causally negligent. As a matter of law, he must be held to have been negligent as to lookout. The percentage of negligence attributable to such failure to maintain adequate lookout is for the jury to determine, but a finding that he was completely without negligence cannot stand.
As to lookout, Martin testified...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.