1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 258 Md.
  5. 258 Md. 437 (1970)
 

WALTER J. CRISMER & SON v. SEAL

[No. 420, September Term, 1969.]

258 Md. 437 (1970)

265 A.2d 918

WALTER J. CRISMER & SON, INC., ET AL. v. SEAL

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided June 5, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip T. McCusker, with whom were Piper & Marbury on the brief, for appellants.

Submitted on brief by M. Jacqueline McCurdy for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, FINAN, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case presents the question of whether certain facts are sufficient to estop an employer from raising the defense of limitations to a late claim for workmen's compensation. The Workmen's Compensation Commission (the Commission) and the trial judge each held the facts did constitute estoppel. We shall reverse that finding.

Code (1964 Repl. Vol.), Art. 101, § 39 (a) requires the filing of claims by employees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases