1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 315 F.Supp.
  5. 315 F.Supp. 365 (1970)
 

JIMENEZ v. PIERCE

No. 70 Civ. 1462 D.N.E.

315 F.Supp. 365 (1970)

Raymond JIMENEZ, Plaintiff, v. Lawrence W. PIERCE, Henry Brill, Santiago Grevi, Arthur J. Rogers, Weldon H. Smith, Commissioner of Correction McGrath, J. P. Conboy, Mr. La Polt, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

July 14, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond Jimenez, pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., by Robert S. Hammer, New York City, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

EDELSTEIN, District Judge.

This is a motion by the Attorney General of New York to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12 (b) (3) for improper venue, or, in the alternative, to transfer this action to a district in which venue properly lies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). While the precise basis of federal jurisdiction is not clearly spelled out in the pro se complaint, it would appear that plaintiff's claim is based in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases