PER CURIAM:
Appellant was convicted by a jury on a three-count indictment charging him with a scheme to defraud certain banks. The appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction, and the particular point he raises is that the evidence did not establish his use of the mails. However, his own admission establishes this jurisdictional fact.
Furthermore, the record is sufficient to support appellant's conviction under 18 U.S.C. ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
