1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 2 Cal.3d
  5. 2 Cal.3d 675 (1970)
 

IN RE HARRELL

Docket Nos. Crim. 13222, 13383, 13855, 13888.

2 Cal.3d 675 (1970)

470 P.2d 640

87 Cal. Rptr. 504

In re HULEN T. HARRELL on Habeas Corpus. In re MERVIN CARLOS McKINNEY on Habeas Corpus. In re HOWARD NEU INGRAM, JR., on Habeas Corpus.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 18, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Hulen T. Harrell, Mervin Carlos McKinney and Howard Neu Ingram, Jr., in pro. per., for Petitioners in Nos. 13222, 13383, 13855 and 13888.

James T. Fousekis, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner in No. 13222.

Paul N. Halvonik and Charles C. Marson for Petitioner in No. 13888 and as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner in No. 13222.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier and Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, Nelson P. Kempsky and George R. Nock, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

OPINION

SULLIVAN, J.

Hulen T. Harrell, Melvin Carlos McKinney and Howard Neu Ingram, Jr., are prison inmates in the lawful custody of the Department of Corrections — Harrell and Ingram at San Quentin Prison and McKinney at Folsom Prison. By separate petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, prepared in propria persona, they complain of limitations placed by prison regulations and authorities upon their rights to give and receive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases