BEILFUSS, J.
The defendant has raised two questions:
(1) Was the circumstantial evidence adduced, believed and rationally considered by the jury sufficient to prove the defendant's possession of stolen property and the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt?
(2) Did the trial court err by admitting into evidence certain property allegedly stolen in the three burglaries?
We have thoroughly reviewed the record, the briefs and arguments of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.