RENNER v. STATE

No. State 11.

48 Wis.2d 627 (1970)

180 N.W.2d 634

RENNER, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided November 3, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by John S. Schlom of Waupun.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Jeffrey B. Bartell, assistant attorney general; the cause was argued by Mary K. Bowman, assistant attorney general.


BEILFUSS, J.

The defendant has raised two questions:

(1) Was the circumstantial evidence adduced, believed and rationally considered by the jury sufficient to prove the defendant's possession of stolen property and the defendant's guilt beyond reasonable doubt?

(2) Did the trial court err by admitting into evidence certain property allegedly stolen in the three burglaries?

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, the briefs and arguments of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases