PALMER v. PROTRKA


476 P.2d 185 (1970)

Beverly PALMER, Appellant, v. Elsie M. PROTRKA, George E. Protrka, John Parypa and Irene L. Parypa, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 5, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger A. Nelson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Thomas L. Moultrie and Reiter, Day, Wall & Bricker, Portland.

Don S. Willner, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Willner, Bennett & Leonard, Portland.

Before PERRY, C.J., and McALLISTER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, DENECKE, HOLMAN and TONGUE, JJ.


O'CONNELL, Chief Justice.

This is a suit for the partition of a parcel of land. Plaintiff appeals from a decree dismissing her complaint.

The property sought to be partitioned was sold for $17,333 and the question now presented is the respective rights of the parties to the proceeds of the sale.

On January 15, 1960, the title to the real property sought to be partitioned was conveyed to Robert Palmer and Elsie Palmer, husband and wife. The title vested...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases