1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 437 Pa.
  5. 437 Pa. 197 (1970)
 

PHILA. TAX REV. BD. v. SMITH, KLINE & F. LAB.

437 Pa. 197 (1970)

Philadelphia Tax Review Board, Appellant, v. Smith, Kline and French Laboratories.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

February 4, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard B. Rosenthal, Assistant City Solicitor, with him Louis E. Vignola, Assistant City Solicitor, Matthew W. Bullock, Jr., Second Deputy City Solicitor, and Edward G. Bauer, Jr., City Solicitor, for Tax Review Board, appellant.

Robert R. Batt, with him Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, for appellee.

Before BELL, C.J., JONES, COHEN, EAGEN, O'BRIEN, ROBERTS and POMEROY, JJ.

OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE COHEN, February 4, 1970:

Smith, Kline and French Laboratories manufactures and sells drugs, as defined by The Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act of September 26, 1961, P.L. 1664, § 2(b), 35 P.S. § 780-2(b) (Act) at two facilities located in Pennsylvania, including one within the limits of the City of Philadelphia. As required by Section 11 of the Act, Smith, Kline and French registered its manufacturing establishments in Pennsylvania in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases