TATE v. TATE

No. 7026DC466.

177 S.E.2d 455 (1970)

9 N.C. App. 681

Joanne Morris TATE v. Clarence Garren TATE, Jr.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

November 18, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hamel & Cannon, by Thomas R. Cannon, Charlotte, for plaintiff appellant.

Richard A. Cohan, Charlotte, for defendant appellee.


CAMPBELL, Judge.

The record does not reveal upon which of defendant's two grounds the trial judge dismissed the complaint. However, we will deal only with the question of venue as it is determinative. In fact it is not only venue but actually jurisdiction. Plaintiff relies heavily, in her brief, upon G.S. § 50-13.5(f) and Professor Lee's comments on that statute in 3 Lee, North Carolina Family Law, § 222, (Supp.1968). However, a close reading of the statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases