The opinion of the court was delivered by
KAUL, J.:
Defendant, Kenneth Fick, appeals from convictions by a jury of forgery in the second degree (K.S.A. 21-608) and uttering a forged instrument (K.S.A. 21-609).
The controlling question is whether the evidence establishes forgery. Defendant concedes the evidence might convict him of passing an insufficient fund check (K.S.A. 21-554) or of cheating
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.