STATE v. RESNICK

No. 41839.

177 N.W.2d 418 (1970)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Arthur I. RESNICK, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 15, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stacker, Silverstein, Burke & Radsom, and Morry N. Rothstein, St. Paul, for appellant.

Douglas M. Head, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, George M. Scott, County Atty., Henry McCarr and David Roston, Asst. County Attys., Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard before KNUTSON, C. J., and ROGOSHESKE, SHERAN, PETERSON and FRANK T. GALLAGHER, JJ.


OPINION

SHERAN, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the offense of knowingly possessing and having under control a narcotic drug, to-wit, Cannabis Sativa L. (commonly known as marijuana).

The issue for decision is whether sufficient evidence was adduced to establish to the reasonable certainty required in criminal prosecutions that defendant violated Minn.St. 618.02, which provides:

"Except as authorized by this chapter it shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases