Judgment affirmed.
Prior to his in-court admission of addiction in November, 1968, defendant was not given an allocution with respect to his right to a jury trial on that question. At that time, although there was a requirement that noncriminal addicts receive such an allocution (L. 1968, ch. 772, eff. June 16, 1968), there was no corresponding requirement as to criminal addicts. While it may well be, as defendant contends, that the guarantee of equal protection of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.