BOMAN v. AUSTIN CO.

No. 95-40219-1.

2 Wn. App. 581 (1970)

469 P.2d 199

ROGER BOMAN, Plaintiff, v. AUSTIN COMPANY, Defendant; AMERICAN MONORAIL COMPANY, Respondent, F.T. CROWE & COMPANY, INC., et al., Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One, Panel 2.

May 4, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reed, McClure & Moceri, Hugh A. McClure, and William R. Hickman, for appellant.

Clarke, Clarke, Albertson & Bovingdon and George H. Bovingdon, for respondent.


WILLIAMS, J.

The initial purpose of this action was the recovery of damages for personal injuries sustained in an industrial accident by plaintiff Boman. The issue on appeal is drawn between F.T. Crowe & Company, Inc., appellant, and American Monorail Company, respondent, over an indemnity provision claimed by respondent to have been incorporated by reference in its subcontract with appellant. The superior court entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases