STATE v. TABASKO

No. 69-385.

22 Ohio St. 2d 36 (1970)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. TABASKO, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 15, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel T. Spitler, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Mr. Gerald A. Messerman, for appellant.


CORRIGAN, J.

The first question to be determined in this appeal is appellant's claim that the trial court erred in admitting in evidence at his trial the items seized during the search of the house. Appellant urges that the seizure was unlawful, because the search warrant was based upon an affidavit which was invalid because it lacked facts establishing probable cause and that the contemporaneous arrest of some of the occupants of the house did not validate the search...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases