Judgment affirmed.
On cross-examination of defendant, the prosecutor was permitted to impeach defendant by eliciting the fact that he had been dishonorably discharged from the United States Army after having been convicted of grand larceny by an Army court-martial. We are of the opinion that no error was thus committed. It has been held that a court-martial conviction for an act which, if committed in this State, would be a felony, may be used as a predicate for second...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
