Judgments affirmed.
In our opinion, appellants' guilt of felony murder was proved beyond a reasonable doubt. A careful analysis of the circumstantial evidence upon which this charge was based indicates that the only reasonable hypothesis flowing naturally from, and consistent with, all the facts is the one accepted by the jury, namely, that appellants were acting in concert and that one of them shot the deceased during the course of an attempted robbery (see People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
