RING v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF BOR. OF RUTHERFORD


110 N.J. Super. 441 (1970)

266 A.2d 129

CARL E. RING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF RUTHERFORD, NEW JERSEY, BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF RUTHERFORD, NEW JERSEY, AND MARTIN KRAJAC, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF RUTHERFORD, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 5, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William V. Roveto argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Moser, Roveto & McGough, attorneys; Mr. George P. Moser, Jr., on the brief).

Mr. M. Harry Muser argued the cause for respondents Mayor and Council of the Borough of Rutherford.

Mr. James S. Ely, Jr. argued the cause for respondents Board of Adjustment and Martin Krajac, Building Inspector of the Borough of Rutherford.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, LEWIS and MATTHEWS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LEWIS, J.A.D.

This is an appeal by plaintiff Carl Ring from a judgment of the Law Division, in an in lieu proceeding, wherein the court affirmed the denial of an application for a variance and sustained the constitutionality of the zoning ordinance of defendant Borough of Rutherford.

It is claimed on appeal that (1) the denial of plaintiff's requested variance was arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases