HENKEL v. BRADSHAW


475 P.2d 75 (1970)

George Edward HENKEL, Petitioner, v. Winston L. BRADSHAW, Honorable Circuit Court Judge of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Oregon, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided October 7, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Clough and Charles J. Merten, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

John C. Anicker, Jr., Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Jack, Goodwin & Anicker, Oregon City.

Before McALLISTER, P.J., and SLOAN, O'CONNELL, DENECKE, HOLMAN, TONGUE and HOWELL, JJ.


Argued and submitted on respondent's demurrer to alternative writ May 8, 1970.

DENECKE, Justice.

The question is whether or not the petitioner is entitled to have legal counsel furnished by the state to represent him in a proceeding in which petitioner has been ordered to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failure to make court-ordered support payments for his child.

The petitioner appeared before the respondent circuit judge in response...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases