WALLENDER v. MICHAS


475 P.2d 72 (1970)

Alice WALLENDER, by Fred Wallender, Her Guardian Ad Litem, Respondent, v. Con MICHAS, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Oregon, Department 1.

Decided October 7, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carrell F. Bradley, Hillsboro, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Joe Bailey and Schwenn, Bradley & Batchelor, Hillsboro.

Mervin W. Brink, Hillsboro, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Brink & Moore, Hillsboro.

Before O'CONNELL, C.J., and McALLISTER, HOLMAN and TONGUE, JJ.


TONGUE, Justice.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $4,800.

Defendant assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to strike testimony by one of plaintiff's doctors that her alleged difficulty in controlling her left hand was a "conversion hysterical response." In support of this assignment defendant contends: (1) Plaintiff's complaint only...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases