1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 46 Wis.2d
  5. 46 Wis.2d 464 (1970)
 

LEEDER v. LEEDER

No. 180.

46 Wis.2d 464 (1970)

176 N.W.2d 262

LEEDER, Respondent, v. LEEDER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 31, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Prazak & Geffs of Clinton, and oral argument by Jacob Geffs.

For the respondent there was a brief by Campbell, Brennan, Steil & Ryan and Thomas J. Basting, all of Janesville, and oral argument by Mr. Basting.

HANLEY, J.

Although the appellant has appealed from the entire judgment, the only issue argued before this court concerns the propriety of the property division, alimony and attorney's fees.

Property division.

As to the property division, it is the appellant's contention that the trial court overvalued the total estate, thereby awarding an excessive amount to the respondent.

            The family assets and liabilities are as
...

                    
                    
                    

                        

                            

                                
                            

                            

                                

                                    
    
                                        
  1. 
                                        
  2. 
                                        
  3. 
                                    

                                

                                

                                    
Let's get started

                                

                                

                                    

                                    Leagle.com
                                    

                                    Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting 
                                    

                                        Sign on now to see your case. 
                                        

                                        Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
                                        

                                        
    
                                            
  • Updated daily.
    • 
                                            
  • Uncompromising quality.
    • 
                                            
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.
    •

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases