BRITT, Judge.
Appellants contend that the trial court erred in modifying previous orders pertaining to Larry's custody without hearing evidence and finding facts on which the appellate court can determine if the modified order is adequately supported by competent evidence and is for the best interest of the minor child. The point is well taken.
In Crosby v. Crosby,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.