1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 468 P.2d
  5. 468 P.2d 29 (1970)
 

PRATHER v. ROTO IGNITION SALES, INC.

No. 22905.

468 P.2d 29 (1970)

Edward PRATHER, M. V. Lingenfelter, and Thomas K. Hudson, Plaintiffs in Error, v. ROTO IGNITION SALES, INC., a Colorado corporation, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

April 20, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alice Loveland, Denver, for plaintiffs in error.

Mattson & Mattson, Fred W. Mattson, Jr., Denver, for defendant in error.

PRINGLE, Justice.

This writ of error arises out of an action based on an exclusive sales agreement. M. V. Lingenfelter, a defendant in the trial court and hereinafter referred to as such or by name, invented a certain kind of automobile engine timer and distributor. He entered into an agreement with Edward Prather, another defendant, concerning the exclusive right to manufacture and sell this timer. Prather then entered into an exclusive sales agreement with Roto...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases