1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 258 Md.
  5. 258 Md. 234 (1970)
 

WOODDY v. MUDD

[No. 389, September Term, 1969.]

258 Md. 234 (1970)

265 A.2d 458

WOODDY v. MUDD

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 13, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward J. Skeens for appellant.

Charles E. Channing, Jr., with whom were James P. Salmon and Sasscer, Clagett, Powers & Channing and M. Wayne Munday on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellant, Louise Rossiter Wooddy, sued her former attorney alleging "breach of professional ethics, malpractice, negligence, [and] conflict of interest". A jury returned a verdict in favor of the attorney, F. DeSales Mudd, the appellee.

Mrs. Wooddy in her appeal raises a number of questions which we shall not be obliged to answer for in Rippon v. Mercantile-Safe Dep., 213 Md. 215

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases