1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 319 F.Supp.
  5. 319 F.Supp. 141 (1970)
 

AMORI v. MATTOS

No. 44963.

319 F.Supp. 141 (1970)

Joseph A. AMORI, and Rapid-Cleave Corp., Plaintiffs, v. David W. MATTOS dba Grove Dale Mfrg. Co. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N. D. California.

August 10, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank A. Neal, Naylor & Neal, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Chalmers Smith of Malovos, Mager & Chasuk, San Jose, Cal., for defendant Chiramonte.

Thomas H. Olson, Townsend & Townsend, San Francisco, Cal., for David W. Mattos.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW UNDER RULE 52, FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

I.

INTRODUCTION

In this action, plaintiffs complain of patent infringement by defendants. The claim is brought under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, and jurisdiction clearly lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). Venue is properly in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases