1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 9 Cal.App.3d
  5. 9 Cal.App.3d 433 (1970)
 

MUTH v. LEINEKE

Docket No. 12266.

9 Cal.App.3d 433 (1970)

88 Cal. Rptr. 1

RAY MUTH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RONALD D. LEINEKE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

July 7, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Max H. Hoseit for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jerrald K. Pickering for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

BRAY, J.*

Judgment roll appeal by plaintiff from judgment in favor of defendants.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. The undisclosed agent's lack of license, said license required by Business and Professions Code, section 7031, bars recovery by plaintiff, an admitted undisclosed principal.

2. Plaintiff may not recover for materials.

RECORD

In October 1966, Eugene...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases