CARLTON v. ANDERSON

No. 7018SC17.

172 S.E.2d 255 (1970)

7 N.C. App. 264

A. P. CARLTON v. W. H. ANDERSON and Randall Sheppard.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

February 25, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Booth, Fish & Adams, by H. Marshall Simpson, Greensboro, for plaintiff appellant.

Jordan, Wright, Nichols, Caffrey & Hill, by Luke Wright and Edward L. Murrelle, Greensboro, for defendant appellees.


BROCK, Judge.

The trial judge ruled as a matter of law that the option contract, attached as an exhibit to the complaint, does not comply with the statute of frauds, G.S. § 22-2. The only assertion is that the description contained in the option is insufficient.

Plaintiff was not allowed to offer evidence to clarify the description or to locate the property. Therefore the only question with which we are concerned on this appeal is whether the description...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases