1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 9 Cal.App.3d
  5. 9 Cal.App.3d 402 (1970)
 

KIMMEL v. KEEFE

Docket No. 26646.

9 Cal.App.3d 402 (1970)

88 Cal. Rptr. 47

A. KIMMEL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. EDWARD KEEFE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

July 6, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Quantz & Tanner and Charles J. Quantz for Defendant and Appellant.

Berlin, O'Grady, Doll & Goodman, Sidney L. Berlin and Fred R. Brinkop for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

ELKINGTON, J.

Defendant Edward Keefe appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff A. Kimmel.

Among other things, and as pertinent here, the complaint alleged: that one E.T. Komsthoeft during the period August through December 1965 under conditional sales contracts purchased from Kimmel certain furniture of the reasonable value of $10,000, on which a balance of $9,309.52 remained unpaid; that Komsthoeft was in default...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases