1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 55 N.J.
  5. 55 N.J. 355 (1970)
 

VAN SICKELL, ET AL. v. MARGOLIS

55 N.J. 355 (1970)

262 A.2d 203

ELIZABETH VAN SICKELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ABE MARGOLIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided March 2, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Raymond C. Connell argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Connell & Andresakes, attorneys).

Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Romei & Bernstein, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 109 N.J.Super. 14.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases