1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 46 Wis.2d
  5. 46 Wis.2d 348 (1970)
 

CRUMMEL v. STATE

No. State 135.

46 Wis.2d 348 (1970)

174 N.W.2d 517

CRUMMEL, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 6, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs and oral argument by Ralph J. Huiras of Port Washington.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and Walter J. Swietlik, district attorney of Ozaukee county.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The defendant makes two claims in support of his argument that he should be relieved of his plea of guilty: one concerns the voluntariness of his confession, the other concerns the time limitation in sec. 954.05 (1), Stats.

The confession.

The defendant claims that the trial court erred in finding, following a Goodchild hearing, that his confession was admissible. The sequence of events leading up to the confession...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases