1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 47 Wis.2d
  5. 47 Wis.2d 330 (1970)
 

NEELY v. STATE

No. State 154.

47 Wis.2d 330 (1970)

171 N.W.2d 79

NEELY, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 2, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by William J. Campbell of Milwaukee.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Allen L. Samson, deputy district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Robert W. Warren, attorney general, and E. Michael McCann, district attorney.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

The defendant was convicted and sentenced on charges of burglary and possession of marijuana. Two issues are raised by writs of error. One relates to the sufficiency of the evidence as to the marijuana conviction. The other involves the sentencing procedure as to both the burglary and marijuana charges.

Sufficiency of evidence.

The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases