QUILLIAN, Judge.
The defendant contends that the trial judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial because the evidence demanded a finding that the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant for $942.75 moving cost and $1,710.78 in unauthorized expenditures by the plaintiff. With this contention we cannot agree.
While the cross action alleged that the plaintiff charged his personal moving expenses to the defendant, an invoice introduced by the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
