PER CURIAM.
The defendant appeals his conviction by a judge sitting without a jury of entering or breaking into an automobile for the purpose of stealing property worth at least $5. MCLA § 750.356a (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.588[1]).
The trial judge's questioning of the defendant and another witness in this nonjury case did not exceed permissible bounds under the standard enunciated in People v. Wilder (1970),
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.