1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 12 Cal.App.3d
  5. 12 Cal.App.3d 344 (1970)
 

HOAR v. TULEY

Docket No. 35790.

12 Cal.App.3d 344 (1970)

90 Cal. Rptr. 559

MARGARETHA HOAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DONALD L. TULEY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

October 26, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Madden & Hart and James A. Madden for Defendants and Appellants.

W.W. Eschwig for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

STEPHENS, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for plaintiff (Margaretha Hoar) and against defendants (Donald L. Tuley and others) for the amount of a nonnegotiable promissory note dated January 19, 1965. (1) The principal defense is that the promissory note was given for services which required a real estate broker's license and the plaintiff's assignor was not so licensed, and therefore the note was not supported...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases