1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 23 Ohio
  5. 23 Ohio St. 2d 11 (1970)
 

STATE, EX REL. LEHMANN v. CMICH

No. 69-764.

23 Ohio St. 2d 11 (1970)

THE STATE, EX REL. LEHMANN, v. CMICH, MAYOR, ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 8, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul M. Perkins, for relator.

Mr. Martin H. Hunker, city solicitor, and Mr. Roy H. Batista, for respondents.

Per Curiam.

It has long been the law of this state that the conditions which must exist to support the issuance of a writ of prohibition are: (1) The court or officer against whom it is sought must be about to exercise judicial or quasi-judicial power; (2) the exercise of such power must be unauthorized by law; and (3) it must appear that the refusal of the writ would result in injury for which there is no other adequate remedy. State, ex rel. Caley,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases