1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 217 Pa.Super.
  5. 217 Pa.Super. 121 (1970)
 

COMMONWEALTH v. PHOENIX

217 Pa.Super. 121 (1970)

Commonwealth v. Phoenix, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

August 6, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard L. Segal, with him Needleman, Needleman, Segal & Tabb, for appellant.

James D. Crawford, Deputy District Attorney, with him James T. Owens, Assistant District Attorney, Richard A. Sprague, First Assistant District Attorney, and Arlen Specter, District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, and CERCONE, JJ.

OPINION PER CURIAM, August 6, 1970:

Appellant was tried and convicted of aggravated robbery. At his trial, he attempted to offer alibi testimony by his wife. Because he had not complied with the notice provisions of Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 312, his offer was excluded. He does not come within the "interest of justice" exception to Rule 312. Cf. Commonwealth v. Shider, 209 Pa.Super. 133, 224 A.2d 802 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases