1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 260 Md.
  5. 260 Md. 51 (1970)
 

BALTO. PAINT & CHEM. CORP. v. BLOOM

[No. 126, September Term, 1970.]

260 Md. 51 (1970)

271 A.2d 516

BALTIMORE PAINT AND CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. BLOOM

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 10, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Yumkas, with whom were Jacob Blum and Blum, Yumkas & Mailman on the brief, for appellant.

Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr., with whom was Stuart H. Rome on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before HAMMOND, C.J., and BARNES, FINAN, SINGLEY and SMITH, JJ.

HAMMOND, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellee, Bloom, sued the appellant, Baltimore Paint and Chemical Corporation, to require it specifically to perform a concededly valid individual employment and retirement contract by paying him in his retirement the monthly sums it had promised in the contract to pay him in such case. The company's defense was that it had discharged its obligation to Bloom when it later included him in a general pension plan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases