1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 254 S.C.
  5. 254 S.C. 28 (1970)
 

PURE OIL DIVISION v. CITY OF COLUMBIA

19028

254 S.C. 28 (1970)

173 S.E.2d 140

PURE OIL DIVISION, Union Oil Company of California, and the South Carolina National Bank, as Trustee for Kay Mauterer, Respondents, v. The CITY OF COLUMBIA, South Carolina; the Board of Adjustment of the City of Columbia; Margaret B. Lovelace; Mary E. Raggio and Rosalie W. Bomar, Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

March 17, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Thomas E. McCutchen, Roy D. Bates and R. Davis Howser, all of Columbia, for Appellants.

Messrs. McLeod & Singletary and Herbert, Dial & Windham, of Columbia, for Respondents.

Messrs. Thomas E. McCutchen, Roy D. Bates and R. Davis Howser, all of Columbia, for Appellants, in Reply.

March 17, 1970.

LEWIS, Justice.

The issues in this appeal arise under the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Columbia, South Carolina.

The respondent, The South Carolina National Bank, has in its charge, as trustee, a parcel of land located on the northwestern corner of the intersection of Trenholm Road and Belt Line Boulevard in the City of Columbia. The parcel measures 238.4 feet on Belt Line Boulevard, 15.9 feet at the intersection, 249.5 feet on Trenholm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases