1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 12 Cal.App.3d
  5. 12 Cal.App.3d 268 (1970)
 

ROSENBERG v. SILINSKY

Docket No. 34209.

12 Cal.App.3d 268 (1970)

90 Cal. Rptr. 548

PERRY ROSENBERG et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v. HERBERT SILINSKY, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

October 23, 1970.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Levinson, Rowen, Klein & Leavy and Alan F. Charles for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants.

Saul & Wiener and Edwin S. Saul for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

OPINION

FILES, P.J.

This action was brought by Perry and Herbert Rosenberg against their former tenant, Herbert Silinsky, to enjoin the use of the trade name "Hub" and for rent allegedly unpaid. Silinsky cross-complained for an injunction against the Rosenbergs. After a trial without a jury the court issued a permanent injunction prohibiting Silinsky from using the name "Hub," "Hub Pharmacy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases