Plaintiff filed an action against defendant Richard Bihr for damages for personal injuries. Richard then quitclaimed to his wife, defendant Norma, all his interest in real property in Richmond owned in joint tenancy by himself and Norma. There was no consideration for this deed, and it was given and received with knowledge that it was intended to hinder, delay and defraud creditors of Richard. Trial of the
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FRY v. BIHR
Docket No. 25950.
6 Cal.App.3d 248 (1970)
85 Cal. Rptr. 742
WILLIE T. FRY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. RICHARD BIHR et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 1, 1970.
April 1, 1970.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Howell, Elson & Grogan and Demetrios P. Agretelis for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Carlson, Collins & Bold and Grant G. Cahhoun for Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
