HALL, Presiding Judge.
Defendant appeals from convictions for burglary and possessing burglary tools.
1. Defendant contends the trial, conviction and sentence under the second charge are nullities as the jury was neither questioned on void dire nor sworn to try the defendant for possessing burglary tools. (The oath given to the jury recited that defendant was charged with the offense of burglary). Defendant's acquiescence to the deviation until after verdict...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
