ROGNRUST v. SETO

No. 131-40969-1.

2 Wn. App. 215 (1970)

467 P.2d 204

JOHN ROGNRUST et al., Respondents, v. DON L. SETO et al., Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One, Panel 2.

March 30, 1970.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Trethewey, Brink & Wilson, Daniel Brink, and Robert Earl Smith, for appellants.

Mullavey, Hageman & Treece and Richard L. Prout, for respondents.


HOROWITZ, A.C.J.

Plaintiffs Rognrust recovered judgment against the defendants Seto fixing the boundary line between their adjoining tracts of land in accordance with a written survey and granting incidental relief. The trial court rejected Setos' contention that by adverse possession they were entitled to an approximate 2-foot strip of the plaintiffs' property so adjudged. Setos appeal, their assignments of error raising the common question as to whether there is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases